Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Seven Network Limited [2007] FCA 1505
TRADE PRACTICES – whether statements made in course of broadcast were misleading or deceptive in breach of s 52 of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – certain statements found to be misleading and deceptive – other representations subject to disclaimer or not adopted – whether exemption from liability for contravention of Act in s 65A of Act applies – prescribed information provider – whether contract, arrangement or understanding made must extend to actual representations made or only to general content – arrangement need not extend to specific representations made – whether supply of goods or services in s 65A(1)(a)(vi)(A) refers to goods or services in connection with which the publication was made (s 65A(1)(a)) or the "relevant goods or services" in s 65A(1)(a)(v) – s 65A(1)(a)(vi)(A) applies to goods or services in connection with which the publication was made – whether prescribed information provider must have a commercial interest in the subject matter of the publication for the exemption to apply – no commercial interest in goods or services the subject matter of the broadcast required – injunction not appropriate as against first respondent
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 51A, 52, 65A, 80
Advanced Hair Studio Pty Ltd v TVN Enterprises Ltd (1987) 18 FCR 1 cited Australian Ocean Line Pty Limited v West Australian Newspapers Limited (1985) 58 ALR 549 applied Bond v Barry [2007] FCA 1484 cited Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Limited (2004) 218 CLR 592 applied Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Limited (2000) 202 CLR 45 cited Global Sportsman PL v Mirror Newspapers Limited (1984) 2 FCR 82 cited Horwitz Grahame Books Pty Ltd v Performance Publications Pty Limited (1987) 8 IR 25 cited ICI v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 cited Johnson & Johnson Pacific Pty Limited v Unilever Australia Limited (No 2) (2006) 70 IPR 574cited Lovatt v Consolidated Magazines Pty Ltd (1988) 12 IPR 261 cited Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191 cited Shipping Corporation of India Limited v Gamlen Chemical Co (Australasia) Proprietary Limited (1980) 147 CLR 142 cited Sun Earth Homes Pty Limited v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1993) 45 FCR 265 considered The Glendarroch [1894] P 226 cited Vines v Djordjevitch (1955) 91 CLR 512 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate