Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Croker v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2007] FCA 1635
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from a decision of the AAT – section 94 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) – whether the appellant had a 'continuing inability to work' – whether impairment assessment under the Act correctly calculated – definition of 'any work' within the Act – Held: decision of the AAT affirmed – appeal dismissed. Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44(1), Schedule 1B
Re Crossland and Secretary Department of Family and Community Services [2004] AATA 864 cited Re Hamal and Secretary, Department of Social Security (1993) 30 ALD 517 cited CLAYTON ROBERT CROKER v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL NSD 776 OF 2007
BRANSON J
30 OCTOBER 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 776 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: CLAYTON ROBERT CROKER
Appellant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS
First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BRANSON J DATE OF ORDER: 30 OCTOBER 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the costs of the first respondent. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 776 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: CLAYTON ROBERT CROKER
Appellant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS
First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate