Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Parkin v O'Sullivan [2007] FCA 1647
THOMAS SCOTT PARKIN v PAUL O'SULLIVAN (SUED IN HIS CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF SECURITY) VID 1594 OF 2005 MOHAMMAD YUSSEF SAGAR and MUHAMMAD FAISAL v PAUL O'SULLIVAN (SUED IN HIS CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF SECURITY VID 188 OF 2006
SUNDBERG J
2 NOVEMBER 2007
MELBOURNE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 1594 OF 2005
BETWEEN: THOMAS SCOTT PARKIN
Applicant
AND: PAUL O'SULLIVAN (SUED IN HIS CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF SECURITY)
Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 188 OF 2006
BETWEEN: MOHAMMAD YUSSEF SAGAR and
MUHAMMAD FAISAL
Applicants
AND: PAUL O'SULLIVAN (SUED IN HIS CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF SECURITY)
Respondent
JUDGE: SUNDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 2 november 2007
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
(a) In matter VID 1594 of 2005 the respondent, on or before 29 November 2007, make discovery of the following documents or categories of documents: (i) the adverse security assessment relating to the applicant; (ii) the respondent's classified determination referred to in pars 34 and 35 of exhibit JG3 to the affidavit of Joe Giacco sworn 3 April 2006; (iii) any record of the telephone call made by ASIO to the applicant in early September 2005; (iv) any record of the respondent's recommendation made for the purposes of s 116 of the Migration Act 1958; (v) any other document relied upon by the respondent in making the adverse security assessment of the applicant; and (vi) any other document the respondent intends to rely on at trial. (b) In matter VID 188 of 2006 the respondent, on or before 29 November 2007, make discovery of the following documents or categories of documents: (i) the adverse security assessment relating to each applicant; (ii) the respondent's classified determination referred to in pars 34 and 35 of exhibit JG3 to the affidavit of Joe Giacco sworn 3 April 2006 in matter VID 1594 of 2005; (iii) any record of the respondent's recommendation made for the purposes of s 116 of the Migration Act 1958; (iv) any other document relied upon by the respondent in making the adverse security assessment of each applicant; and (v) any other document the respondent intends to rely on at trial. (c) In matter VID 1594 of 2005 the respondent pay the applicant's costs of the remittal hearing of 21 September 2007. (d) In matter VID 188 of 2006 the respondent pay the applicants' costs of the remittal hearing of 21 September 2007. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate