Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
P Dawson Nominees Pty Ltd (ACN 004 743 408) v Multiplex Limited (ACN 008 687 063)[2007] FCA 1659
PRIVILEGE – representative proceeding claiming breach of continuous disclosure obligations – investigation by Australian Securities and Investments Commission – where applicant served subpoena duces tecum on ASIC to produce certain documents and transcripts in its possession following investigation – objection to production by ASIC on grounds of public interest immunity privilege – where application heard ex parte to preserve subject‑matter of ASIC claim for public interest immunity privilege – public interest immunity privilege claim rejected – confidential reasons. Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Ch 5C, s 674 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth): Pt IVA, ss 17(4), 50 Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth): ss 25, 93AA, 127(1)
Applicant Y v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority [2005] FCAFC 222, cited Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417, cited Raybos Australia Pty Ltd v Jones [1985] 2 NSWLR 47, cited P DAWSON NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 004 743 408) v MULTIPLEX LIMITED (ACN 008 687 063) & MULTIPLEX FUNDS MANAGEMENT LIMITED (ACN 105 371 917) VID 1380 of 2006
GOLDBERG J
2 NOVEMBER 2007
MELBOURNE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 1380of 2006
BETWEEN: P DAWSON NOMINEES PTY LTD
(ACN 004 743 408)
Applicant
AND: MULTIPLEX LIMITED
(ACN 008 687 063)
First Respondent
MULTIPLEX FUNDS MANAGEMENT LIMITED
(ACN 105 371 917)
Second Respondent
JUDGE: GOLDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 2 NOVEMBER 2007
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The proceeding be adjourned for further hearing on 14 November 2007. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate