Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZHML v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 1750
SZHML v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 987 OF 2007
SUNDBERG J
16 NOVEMBER 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 987 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZHML
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SUNDBERG J DATE OF ORDER: 16 NOVEMBER 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal fixed at $3,000.00. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 987 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZHML
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SUNDBERG J
DATE: 16 NOVEMBER 2007
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Background 1 The appellant is a citizen of the People's Republic of China who arrived in Australia on 12 January 2005. On 1 February 2005 he applied for a protection visa. A delegate of the first respondent refused the application. The appellant's application for a review of that decision by the Refugee Review Tribunal was unsuccessful, and he sought review of the Tribunal's decision by the Federal Magistrates Court. That application was also unsuccessful, and he has appealed to this Court. Pursuant to s 25(1AA) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 the appeal is heard by a single judge.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate