Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZFZQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1774
SZFZQ AND SZFZR v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 1273 OF 2007
STONE J
8 NOVEMBER 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1273 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZFZQ
First Appellant
SZFZR
Second Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: STONE J DATE OF ORDER: 8 NOVEMBER 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed with costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1273 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZFZQ
First Appellant
SZFZR
Second Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE: 8 November 2007
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal from a decision of the Federal Magistrate in which his Honour dismissed the appellants' applications for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal; [2007] FMCA 991. The Tribunal rejected the appellants' application for protection visas. This was the second decision by the Refugee Review Tribunal in relation to the appellants' applications. The first, given on 7 February 2005 was quashed by consent in the Federal Magistrates Court and the matter was remitted to a second Tribunal. It is this second decision which is the subject of the present appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate