Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Uniline Australia Ltd v SBriggs Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1799 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of the categories of documents which might be made the subject of a list of documents by each party in two proceedings to be heard together – consideration of issues in relation to an action for threats with a cross‑claim for patent infringement and a cross proceeding for revocation – consideration of a threats proceeding for Registered Design infringement – consideration of infringement questions
Patents Act 1990 (Cth), ss 7(1), 7(2) and 7(3), s 18(1)(b)(i) and (ii), s 40(3), s 120(3) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Designs Act 2003 (Cth), s 156, s 156(2), s 156(3)(a), s 156(3)(b) Designs Act 1906 (as amended) (Cth), s 30(1)(a), (b) and (c) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 55
Dunlop Rubber Co. Ltd v Golf Ball Developments Ltd (1931) 48 RPC 268 Rose v J W Pickawant & Co. Ltd (1923) 40 RPC 320 Polyaire Pty Ltd v K‑Aire Pty Ltd (2005) 221 CLR 287 Turbo‑Tek Enterprises Inc. v Sperling Enterprises Pty Ltd (1989) 23 FCR 331 Raleigh Cycle Coy. Ld. and Another v H. Miller and Coy Ld. (1948) 65 RPC 141 Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd (No. 2) (2007) 235 ALR 202 UNILINE AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 010 752 057 v SBRIGGS PTY LTD ACN 007 415 518 AND CARMELO JOSEPH LICCIARDI DI STEFANO QUD236 OF 2007
GREENWOOD J
21 NOVEMBER 2007
BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QUD236 OF 2007
BETWEEN: UNILINE AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 010 752 057
Applicant/First Cross Respondent/Further Cross-Claimant
AND: SBRIGGS PTY LTD ACN 007 415 518
Respondent/Cross-Claimant/ First Further Cross‑Respondent
CARMELO JOSEPH LICCIARDI DI STEFANO
Second Cross‑Respondent/Second Further Cross‑Respondent
JUDGE: GREENWOOD J DATE OF ORDER: 21 NOVEMBER 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate