Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZGLM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1840
SZGLM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 1475 OF 2007
LINDGREN J
12 NOVEMBER 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1475 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZGLM
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: LINDGREN J DATE OF ORDER: 12 NOVEMBER 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1475 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZGLM
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: LINDGREN J
DATE: 12 NOVEMBER 2007
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
INTRODUCTION 1 The appellant appeals from a decision of the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia delivered on 12 July 2007 dismissing his application for review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (the RRT): SZGLM v Minister for Immigration [2007] FMCA 1119. The RRT's decision was handed down on 14 December 2006. By that decision, the RRT affirmed a decision of a delegate of the first respondent (respectively the Delegate and the Minister) refusing to grant the appellant a protection visa. 2 The second respondent, the RRT, has filed a submitting appearance, save as to costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate