Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZIOF v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1858
MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of a Federal Magistrate reviewing a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal – Nepalese citizen claiming persecution at the hands of Maoists – whether Federal Magistrate erred in not considering whether the appellant was at risk in relation to incidents of violence which the Tribunal found were likely to recur – s 424A Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether fact that Nepalese citizens have rights of abode in India "information" within the meaning in s 424A or "subjective appraisals, thought processes or determinations" – whether Tribunal should have specifically put to the appellant that she could have left Nepal for India immediately on obtaining a passport – whether independent basis for decision Held: Appeal dismissed. Tribunal found peace accord holding and that the chance of harm from Maoists extremely remote. Tribunal properly assessed whether well-founded fear of persecution existed and no error arises. That the appellant could have left Nepal for India was information for the purposes of s 424A which falls within the exception in s 424A(3)(a) as it pertains to all Nepalese citizens in possession of a passport and was not required to be specially put to the appellant.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 424A
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Applicant A125 of 2003 [2007] FCAFC 162 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v QAAH of 2004 (2006) 231 ALR 340 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Respondents S152/2003 (2004) 222 CLR 1 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairsv NAMW (2004) 140 FCR 572 applied NADH of 2001 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 328 cited Paul v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 113 FCR 396 cited SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs(2005) 215 ALR 162 cited SZBJQ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1346 cited SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 235 ALR 609 cited SZFLL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 355 cited SZGQZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1091 cited Tin v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1109 cited VAAM v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 120 cited VAF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 206 ALR 471 applied WAGP of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002) 124 FCR 276 cited WAJW v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 330 considered
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate