Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZIOZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1870
MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Magistrates Court – where delegate of first respondent refused application for protection visa – where second respondent affirmed decision of delegate – where Federal Magistrates Court dismissed application for constitutional writs – where appellant national of People's Republic of China – where delegate accepted appellant a Falun Gong practitioner in China – where delegate decided appellant not of interest to Chinese authorities – where second respondent decided appellant not a Falun Gong practitioner in China – where invitation to appear did not advise appellant that whether appellant a Falun Gong practitioner in China a fact in issue – where letter from second respondent sent to appellant after hearing – where letter provided particulars of information and invited appellant to comment – where appellant identifies alleged categories of information not properly raised by letter – whether question whether appellant a Falun Gong practitioner in China an issue arising in relation to the decision under review – whether second respondent obliged under s 425(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to give notice to appellant of that issue – whether letter sent after hearing can satisfy obligation – whether failure to comply with s 425(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether letter sent after hearing can satisfy s 424A Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether failure to comply with s 424A Migration Act 1958 (Cth). Held: Whether appellant a Falun Gong practitioner in China an issue arising in relation to the decision under review – second respondent obliged under s 425(1) to give notice of issue where not apparent from delegate's decision – letter sent after hearing not capable of satisfying notice obligation – second respondent breached s 425(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – letter sent after hearing capable of satisfying s 424A – alleged categories of information not raised by letter not information within s 424A – no failure to comply with s 424A Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – appeal allowed. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(1AA), s 27 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 91R(3), 91X, 422B, 424A, 425 Lee v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 159 FCR 181 referred to SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 79 ALJR 1009 referred to Sobey v Nicol and Davies, in the matter of Guiseppe Antonio Mercorella [2007] FCAFC 136 referred to SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 231 ALR 592 considered SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 235 ALR 609 considered SZEEU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 150 FCR 214 referred to SZIOZ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 203 OF 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate