Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SZJSPv Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1925
CITIZENSHIP AND MIGRATION – migration – review of decisions – Refugee Review Tribunal – conduct of review – notice to appear – where notice sent to firm of solicitors but not addressed to authorised recipient ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – discretionary relief – exercising discretion to refuse relief where there has been jurisdictional error but no likely prospect of ultimate success – appellant had actual notice of hearing – appellant appeared and was fully heard Held: appeal dismissed – failure to address invitation to appear directly to authorised recipient is an error of law – discretion may be exercised to refuse relief where a proven technical legal error cannot undermine the essential legal basis on which case originally decided Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 441G SZFOH v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 159 FCR 199 considered Lee v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 159 FCR 181 considered Vean of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 133 FCR 570 considered SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 235 ALR 609 applied Giretti v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 70 FCR 151 applied SZJSP v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 1575 OF 2007
MADGWICK J
22 NOVEMBER 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1575 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZJSP
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MADGWICK J DATE OF ORDER: 22 NOVEMBER 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate