Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Woodside Energy Ltd (ABN 63 005 482 986) v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2007] FCA 1961 TAXATION – petroleum resource rent tax – taxable profit – assessable receipts less deductible expenditure – assessable petroleum receipts – whether a net concept – net of expenses payable in relation to sale of marketable petroleum commodities – whether such expenses include hedging losses – range of expenses covered by connection – direct relationship to commodity sales required – text of provision – context and scheme of Act – legislative history – Explanatory Memorandum – hedging expenses not able to be taken into account in determining assessable petroleum receipts – whether expenses comprised deductible expenditure incurred in carrying on or providing operations facilities and other things comprising the project – insufficient connection with the conduct of the project – hedging losses not general project expenditure EVIDENCE - expert economic and accounting opinion – economic rent taxing model said to underpin statute – evidence that proposed model initiated process leading to enactment of statute – economic model equating hedging losses – insufficient evidence of connection to actual terms of statute to provide assistance in construction – expert accounting evidence – treatment of hedging losses as expenses of sale – utility dependent upon anterior construction of statute WORDS AND PHRASES - "in relation to" Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Assessment Act 1987 (Cth) s 21, s 22, s 24, s 32, s 38 Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Act 1987 (Cth) Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15AB Petroleum Resource Rent Legislation Amendment Act 1991 No 80 of 1991 Taxation Laws Amendment Act (No 3) 1991 No 216 of 1991 Atlantic Sugar Refineries v Minister of National Revenue [1949] CTC 196 cited Australian Gas Light Company v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 137 FCR 317 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Maritime Union of Australia (2001) 114 FCR 472 cited Boral Besser Masonry Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 215 CLR 374 cited Echo Bay Mines Ltd v R [1992] CF 707 cited Melway Publishing Pty Ltd v Robert Hicks Pty Ltd (2001) 205 CLR 1 cited O'Grady v Northern Queensland Co Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 356 cited Placer Dome Canada Ltd v Ontario (Minister of Finance) (2006) SCC 20 cited Robe River Mining Co Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 21 FCR 1 cited Stevens v Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment (2005) 224 CLR 193 cited Woodside Energy Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2006) 155 FCR 357 cited Workers' Compensation Board (Qld) v Technical Products Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 642 cited WOODSIDE ENERGY LTD (ABN 63 005 482 986) v THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA WAD 282 OF 2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate