Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Canpoint International Pty Limited v Anar International Pvt Ltd [2008] FCA 4
CORPORATIONS – application under ss 459G and 459H of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to set aside statutory demand – offsetting claim – identity of person against whom offsetting claim is made – requirements for supporting affidavit – reliance upon supplementary affidavits – part of supporting affidavit served on defendant not read at hearing – whether affidavit as read materially different from that served on defendant – calculation of amount of offsetting claim – claim for losses from potential litigation – claim for loss of business – whether plaintiff's conduct contributed to loss of business – whether order to set aside statutory demand should be made subject to conditions CONTRACT – non-assignability of contractual obligations – novation "genuine claim", "affidavit supporting the application" Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 459G, 459H, 459J, 459M Corporate Law Reform Bill 1992 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 60 71 Paisley Street Footscray Pty Ltd v Vineyards Estate Pty Ltd [1995] FCA 635(unreported, Olney J, 18 August 1995) approved Advance Ship Design Pty Ltd v DJ Ryan t/as Davies Collison Cave (1995)16 ACSR 129 approved Chadwick Industries (South Coast) Pty Ltd v Condensing Vaporisers Pty Ltd (1994) 13 ACSR 37 cited Chase Manhattan Bank Australia Ltd v Oscty Pty Ltd (1995) 17 ACSR 128 followed Classic Ceramic Importers Pty Ltd v Ceramica Antiga SA (1994) 13 ACSR 263 approved Edge Technology Pty Ltd v Lite-On Technology Corporation (2000) 34 ACSR 301 followed/distinguished Elm Financial Services Pty Ltd v MacDougal [2004] NSWSC 560 followed Federico's Restaurant Pty Ltd v Warwick Entertainment Centre Pty Ltd (1995) 18 ACSR 702 approved Graywinter Properties Pty Ltd v Gas & Fuel Corporation Superannuation Fund (1996) 70 FCR 452 followed Hansmar Investments Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd (2007) 61 ACSR 321 considered Jesseron Holdings Pty Ltd v Middle East Trading Consultants Pty Ltd (No 2) (1994) 122 ALR 717 considered John Shearer Limited v Gehl Company (1995) 60 FCR 136 considered Lighting Sciences Australasia Pty Ltd v Southgate (1997) 15 ACLC 632 cited Macleay Nominees Pty Ltd v Belle Property East Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 743 discussed Olsson v Dyson (1968) 120 CLR 365 considered Process Machinery Australia Pty Ltd (t/as DCL Engineering) v ACN 057 260 590 Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 45 discussed Re Morris Catering (Australia) Pty Ltd (1993) 11 ACSR 601 approved Royal Premier Pty Ltd v Taleski [2001] WASCA 48 followed Sacon Constructions Pty Ltd v Concrite Quarries Pty Ltd (1997) 15 ACLC 1303 discussed Scanhill Pty Ltd v Century 21 Australasia Pty Ltd (1993) 47 FCR 451 followed SMEC International Pty Ltd v CEMS Engineering Inc (2001) 38 ACSR 595 followed Tito v Waddell (No 2) [1977] Ch 106 considered Topfelt Pty Limited v State Bank of New South Wales Limited (1993) 47 FCR 226 followed Carter JW, Peden E and Tolhurst GJ, Contract Law in Australia (5th ed, LexisNexis Butterworths,2007) CANPOINT INTERNATIONAL PTY LIMITED v ANAR INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD NSD 2501 OF 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate