Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hazelbane v Northern Territory of Australia [2008] FCA 291 NATIVE TITLE – application to strike out native title claim under s 84C(1) Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – approach under s 84C(1) compared to general principles of summary dismissal – whether claimants properly authorised under s 251B to bring claim – whether certain members of claimant group authorised by all members of native title claim group to bring claim on required by s 251B – whether claimant group constitute a native title claim group for purposes of s 251B Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Aboriginal Land Rights Act (1976) Williams v Grant [2004] FCAFC 178 referred to Bodney v Bropho (2004) 140 FCR 77 referred to Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioner (1949) 78 CLR 62 referred to General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125 referred to Landers v South Australia (2003) 128 FCR 495 discussed/referred to Quall v Risk [2001] FCA 389 referred to Dieri People v South Australia (2003) 127 FCR 364 referred to Quandamooka People (No 1) v State of Queensland [2002] FCA 259 referred to Moran v Minister of Land and Water Conservation for New South Wales [1999] FCA 1637 referred to Daniel v Western Australia [2002] FCA 1147 referred to Risk v Northern Territory [2006] FCA 404 referred to Harrington-Smith v Western Australia (No 9) (2007) 238 ALR 1 referred to Bodney v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 890 discussed Rocklea Spinning Mills Pty Ltd v Anti-Dumping Authority (1995) 56 FCR 406 referred to Ward v Western Australia (1998) 159 ALR 483 referred to Risk v National Native Title Tribunal [2000] FCA 1589 referred to Tilmouth v Northern Territory [2001] 109 FCR 240 referred to Energy Australia v Australian Energy [2001] FCA 1049 referred to Tallglen Pty Ltd v Pay TV Holdings Pty Ltd (1996) 22 ACSR 130 referred to GABRIEL HAZELBANE & ORS ON BEHALF OF THE WARAI AND KUNGARAKANY GROUPS v NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA & ORS NTD 6057 OF 2001 THOMAS PETHERICK & ORS ON BEHALF OF THE EMU AND BLUE TONGUE LIZARD CLANS v NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA & ORS NTD 21 OF 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate