Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Textile Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia v Deanones Pty Ltd (ACN 074 977 825) [2008] FCA 338
TEXTILE CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR UNION OF AUSTRALIA v DEANONES PTY LTD (ACN 074 977 825) VID 205 OF 2006
NORTH J
4 FEBRUARY 2008
MELBOURNE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 205 OF 2006
BETWEEN: TEXTILE CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR UNION OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant
AND: DEANONES PTY LTD (ACN 074 977 825)
Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J
DATE OF ORDER: 4 FEBRUARY 2008
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The respondent is to pay the applicant the amount of $6000. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 205 OF 2006
BETWEEN: TEXTILE CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR UNION OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant
AND: DEANONES PTY LTD (ACN 074 977 825)
Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J
DATE: 4 FEBRUARY 2008
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 In this matter, the applicant, the Textile Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia, seeks judgment against the respondent, Deanones Pty Ltd, for the amount owing under a written agreement in settlement of the application. 2 Clause 6 of the settlement agreement provided that the respondent would pay to the applicant $8000. Clause 7 provided that payment was to be made in four instalments of $2000 each. 3 Mr Nguyen appeared on behalf of the respondent by leave granted by the Court. Mr Nguyen is the sole director of the respondent. He agreed that he had signed the agreement on behalf of the respondent, and that the respondent had paid the first instalment under the agreement. He also accepted that the respondent had failed to pay the remaining three instalments. They were due respectively on 20 April 2006, 10 May 2006 and 30 May 2006. Mr Nguyen accepts that the amount of $6000 is still outstanding under the agreement. 4 Clause 9 of the agreement provided for default. It permitted the applicant to enter judgment for the amount of the agreed sum as a debt owing. There will be judgment against the respondent for the sum of $6000 as a result of its default under the terms of the agreement. I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice North.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate