Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZCOS v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 570 MIGRATION – decision upholding refusal of Protection (Class XA) Visa – whether Tribunal entitled to base finding only on demeanour – Tribunal entitled to have regard to demeanour – Tribunal's rejection of claims based on several strands of reasoning only one of which was demeanour – whether Tribunal obliged to ask questions – Tribunal not obliged to frame further questions – findings adverse to appellant do not indicate bias or apprehended bias – no jurisdictional error MIGRATION – test for well-founded fear of persecution – whether Tribunal applied wrong test (probability test) – whether real chance test in Chan v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 should be applied to each past persecutory event claimed – findings of past events not in same category as assessment of future events – Tribunal's reasons for findings on past events not attended by doubt – Tribunal not required to consider each past event by applying real chance test Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 applied Chan v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 considered Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 cited Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 cited Guo v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1996) 64 FCR 151 cited Kalala v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 114 FCR 212 considered Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 considered Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam (1997) 93 FCR 220 considered Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 (2003) 198 ALR 59 cited Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte H (2001) 179 ALR 425 cited SAAK v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2002) 121 FCR 185 cited SBBS v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2002) 194 ALR 749 applied State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (In liq) (1999) 160 ALR 583 cited SZCOS v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2007] FMCA 1471 considered SZDTZ v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 1824 cited WAEJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 76 ALD 597 cited W148/00A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 185 ALR 703 cited Yakubu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 57 cited SZCOS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate