Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shaheed v Tax Agents' Board of New South Wales [2008] FCA 703
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – meaning of "fit and proper person to prepare tax returns" – whether Tribunal misconstrued meaning of "fit and proper" – whether Tribunal failed to have regard to the test in Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 – whether the Tribunal took into account irrelevant considerations – whether decision of Tribunal otherwise unreasonable. Held: (1) The appellant did not demonstrate any error in the approach of the Tribunal Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 251JC, 251N Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd v Kenna Investments Pty Ltd (2004) 138 FCR 428 referred to Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 discussed Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 discussed Davies v Australian Securities Commission (1995) 131 ALR 295 discussed Kazacos v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2007] FCA 1573 referred to Minister Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 referred to Re Su and the Tax Agents' Board of South Australia (1982) 13 ATR 192 discussed Toohey v Tax Agents' Board of Victoria [2007] FCA 431 discussed MOHAMMED SHAHEED v TAX AGENTS' BOARD OF NEW SOUTH WALES NSD 2273 OF 2006 MOHAMMED SHAHEED v TAX AGENTS' BOARD OF NEW SOUTH WALES NSD 1956 OF 2007
ALLSOP J
23 MAY 2008
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2273 OF 2006
BETWEEN: MOHAMMED SHAHEED
Applicant
AND: TAX AGENTS' BOARD OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Respondent
JUDGE: ALLSOP J
DATE OF ORDER: 23 MAY 2008
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate