Tervonen v Finland [2008] FCA 781

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Tervonen v Finland [2008] FCA 781 EXTRADITION – review of surrender determination of Magistrate in respect of applicant – challenge to sufficiency of "supporting documents" under s 19 Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) – whether certain arrest warrants validly authenticated – whether arrest warrant backing for certain extradition offences – whether certain arrest warrants were for the arrest of the applicant for an extradition offence or for coercive investigation only – whether determination of latter issue foreclosed by High Court authority – whether dual criminality established for certain extradition offences – whether certain extradition offences barred by time limitation in Finland – whether applicant on remand for purposes of s 19 Extradition Act – whether notice of extradition request issued out of time for purposes of s 16 Extradition Act – whether applicant afforded reasonable time before Magistrate – grounds of review not made out – orders of Magistrate confirmed Extradition Act 1988 (Cth), ss 5, 11, 12, 15, 16, 16(1), 16(2)(a)(i), 16(2)(a)(ii), 16(2)(b), 17(2)(a), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(2)(a), 19(3)(a), 19(7), 19(8), 19(9), 21, 21(2)(b)(i), 22 Extradition (Finland) Regulations, cl 3, cl 4, Sch 1, Sch 2 Treaty between Australia and Finland concerning Extradition, Arts 1, 7, 7(2)(d), 8, 8(2), 14

Minister for Home Affairs v Tervonen (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 32related Minister for Home Affairs v Tervonen [2008] FCAFC 24related Republic of Finland v Tervonen [2008] FCAFC 25related Tervonen v Finland [2007] FCA 2067related Tervonen v Minister for Justice and Customs (No 3) [2007] FCA 1898 related Tervonen v Minister for Justice and Customs [2007] FCA 1684; (2007) 98 ALD 589related Brock v United States of America (2007) 157 FCR 121 cited Director of Public Prosections (Cth) v Kainhofer (1995) 185 CLR 528followed Dutton v O'Shane (2003) 132 FCR 352 at 386 cited Kainhofer v Director of Public Prosecutions (1994) 52 FCR 341discussed Zoeller v Federal Republic of Germany (1989) 23 FCR 282 applied JAN TERVONEN v FINLAND and MAGISTRATE PAUL LYON