Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Cumins [No 5] [2008] FCA 794 BANKRUPTCY – petition – opposed on grounds that bankruptcy notice invalid as amount stated to be due was overstated – whether notice under s 41(5) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) on its proper constructionrequired to be given to petitioning creditor – if so whether notice under s 41(5) was given – whether, in circumstances where notice under s 41(5) not given, the provisions of s 306 of the Act have application – whether proof of the fact that the debt relied upon was still owing – s 52(1)(c) – consideration of discretion under s 52(2)(b): "other sufficient cause". Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth),ss 29(7), 42(A)1B Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth),ss 40(1)(g), 41(5), 43, 52(1)(c) Bankruptcy Regulations 1996 (Cth), reg 4.02, Form 1 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth),s 160 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), ss 8AAZM, 14ZZK(a), 14ZZL Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 170(1) Adams v Lambert (2006) 228 CLR 409discussed Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Infomercial Management Group Pty Ltd [2002] VSC 262 referred to Cumins v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation for the Commonwealth of Australia [2007] WASCA 30referred to Cumins v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCA 1847 followed Cumins v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCAFC 207cited Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Cumins [No 4] [2008] FCA 558cited Emerson v Wreckair Pty Ltd (1992) 33 FCR 581 cited Hussain v King Investment Solutions (2006) 153 FCR 428followed Makhoul v Barnes (1995) 60 FCR 572cited Pedikaris v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [No 2] [2007] FCA 2087discussed Re Charles Murray (1959) 18 ABC 152not followed Re Florance; Ex parte Turimetta Properties Pty Ltd (1979) 28 ALR 403 referred to Re Hanby; Ex parte Flemington Central Spares Pty Ltd (1967) 10 FLR 378 referred to Re Murdoch; Ex parte Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [1994] FCA 737 discussed Re Wilhemsen; Ex parte Gould (1986) 11 FCR 107not followed Robert Hudson Junior v Thomas James Donald [1997] FCA 852discussed Seovic Civil Engineering Pty Ltd v Groeneveld (1999) 87 FCR 120discussed SGRO v Liberty Funding Pty Ltd (2004) 207 ALR 625referred to St George Wholesale Finance Pty Ltd v Spalla (2000) 181 ALR 682not followed White Industries Australia Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2003] FCA 599; (2003) 129 FCR 276cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate