Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZCQT v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 822
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) WAEE v The Minister of Immigration [2003] FCAFC 184 Randhawa v the Minister for Immigration and Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437 Muin v the Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30
SZCQT v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
NSD 2430 of 2007
REEVES J
16 MAY 2008
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2430 of 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZCQT
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: REEVES J DATE OF ORDER: 16 MAY 2008
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $2,300.00. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2430 of 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZCQT
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: REEVES J
DATE: 16 MAY 2008
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal against the judgment of Federal Magistrate Raphael dated 28 November 2007, dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ('the Tribunal') handed down on 21 September 2006. The Tribunal had affirmed a decision of the delegate of the Minister to refuse to grant a protection visa to the appellant. The appellant alleges, without giving particulars, that the Federal Magistrate and the Tribunal committed a number of errors in reaching their decisions on his claims. For the reasons I am about to give, I have concluded that none of those alleged errors has substance, and even if any did, none of them amounts to jurisdictional error. This appeal will, therefore, be dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate