Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZJVS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 848
NAVX v the Minister [2004] FCAFC 287 SZJVS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
NSD 2538 of 2007
REEVES J
24 APRIL 2008
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2538 of 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZJVS
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: REEVES J DATE OF ORDER: 24 APRIL 2008
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $3,000.00. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2538 of 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZJVS
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: REEVES J
DATE: 24 APRIL 2008
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction 1 The appellant is a citizen of Pakistan. He arrived in Australia during May of 2006 and applied for a protection visa (class XA) on 20 June 2006. In that application he relied upon a 'clear threat to his life and liberties' on return to Pakistan because of his political activities in that country. That application was rejected by a delegate of the Minister and the appellant has unsuccessfully sought review before the Refugee Review Tribunal ('the Tribunal'), the Federal Magistrates Court, and now this Court. For the reasons I am about to give, this Court must dismiss the appellant's appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate