Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Granitgard Pty Ltd ACN 007 427 590 v Termicide Pest Control Pty Ltd ACN 093 837 337 [2008] FCA 865 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – amended notice of motion – application to vacate trial dates – leave to file further amended statement of claim – whether vacation of trial will prejudice respondent PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to inspect property of third party premises pursuant to O 17 of the Federal Court Rules – offer of undertaking to the court as to confidentiality COSTS – whether respondent entitled to costs thrown away as a result of the vacation of trial dates – whether on an indemnity or standard basis – whether applicant entitled to costs of notice of motion if successful Held: upon applicant providing undertaking regarding contact with third parties, leave to file further amended statement of claim granted and trial dates vacated – any prejudice to respondent compensable by costs and undertaking – inspection of property of third party ordered in light of further amendments to pleadings – confidentiality requires inspection be conducted by expert independent of applicant – applicant to pay respondent's costs thrown away as result of vacation of trial dates and further amendment to pleadings – circumstances of case not such as to warrant indemnity costs – costs of amended notice of motion reserved
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 51A, 52, 53 Federal Court Rules O 13 r 2, O 17
Abela v Giew (1964) 81 WN (Pt 1) NSW 344 cited Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish (1980) 29 ALR 228 cited Caruso Australia Pty Ltd v Portec Australia Pty Ltd [1986] FCA 40 cited Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Limited (1993) 46 FCR 225 cited David Charles Robinson v Aware Industries Ltd (unreported, Weinberg J, 1 October 1998) cited Dresna Pty Ltd v Misu Nominees Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1537 cited Ex parte Fielder Gillespie Ltd [1984] 2 QdR 339 cited Ketteman v Hansel Properties Ltd [1987] AC 189 cited Londish v Gulf Pacific Pty Ltd (1993) 45 FCR 128 cited Menzies v CRCI Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 118 cited Smith v Gannawarra Shire Council (2002) 4 VR 344 cited SPI Spirits (Cyprus) Ltd v Diageo Australia Ltd (No 4) [2007] FCA 1035 applied State of Queensland v JL Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146 cited The Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate