Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lip-Air Pty Limited v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2008] FCA 866
Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 33(1), s 33(3) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 41(2) Administration Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Civil Aviation Act 1988 (Cth) s 28, s 28BA(1)(aa), s 28BA(3), s 28BAA, s 31A, s 31C Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 Part 16, Regulation 217(3) Civil Aviation Safety Authority v Boatman (2004) 138 FCR 384 Civil Aviation Safety Authority v Boatman [2006] FCA 460 LIP-AIR PTY LTD, SCOTT WILLIAM MCKENZIE and SIDNEY MICHAEL SMITH v CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
NSD837 OF 2008
BUCHANAN J
5 JUNE 2008
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD837 OF 2008
BETWEEN: LIP-AIR PTY LTD
First Applicant
SCOTT WILLIAM MCKENZIE
Second Applicant
SIDNEY MICHAEL SMITH
Third Applicant
AND: CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
Respondent
JUDGE: BUCHANAN J
DATE OF ORDER: 5 JUNE 2008
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The decisions contained in letters dated 2 June 2008 to Sidney Michael Smith and Scott William McKenzie respectively, which have been marked exhibits 7 and 9 in the interlocutory proceedings, are stayed until 1500 hours on 6 June 2008. 2. The application filed in Court today is adjourned for attention in due course by the docket judge to whose docket the matter is allocated. 3. The costs of today's proceedings are reserved. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD837 OF 2008
BETWEEN: LIP-AIR PTY LTD
First Applicant
SCOTT WILLIAM MCKENZIE
Second Applicant
SIDNEY MICHAEL SMITH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate