Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Edwards v Liquid Engineering 2003 Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 970 CONTRACTS – whether post-contractual conduct is admissible on the question of what a contract means – relevance of the subjective intentions of the parties to a contract – whether contract may be formed where there is an agreement to agree as to price or other substantive term – whether silence or failure to object to an unsolicited offer may constitute acceptance COSTS – whether costs should be awarded in favour of applicant where application is dismissed as moot but would otherwise have been successful on the merits EQUITY – estoppel – whether silence between intermittent threats of infringement may give rise to estoppel – whether equity will intervene when there is an adequate remedy at law – whether silence or failure to object to an unsolicited offer may give rise to an estoppel – whether wrongfully registered proprietor of a trade mark holds the mark on constructive trust for true owner – whether injunction should be granted where there is no showing of likelihood of future infringement TRADE MARKS – appeal from decision of Registrar of Trade Marks that registered proprietor's name be removed from the Register due to lack of intent to use the mark in good faith – whether appeal should be dismissed as moot where Court cannot grant relief sought even if applicant is successful – how mark is to be defined – whether mark includes or is associated with an image or particular graphic representation – whether ownership rights with respect to a mark are limited to goods of the same description – infringement action based on deceptive similarity – whether side-by-side comparison is required – whether presence or absence of additional descriptive word or associated image will avoid finding of deceptive similarity where distinctive or essential feature of the mark is borrowed – whether evidence of intent to deceive raises rebuttable presumption of consumer confusion – ownership of unregistered mark – right to register – meaning of "person aggrieved" under s 88 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – power of Court to direct amendment of Register by substitution of registered proprietor's name with the applicant's – power and discretion of the Court under ss 89, 122, 123, and 124 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) to refuse relief where a party would otherwise be liable for infringement – quantum – election – whether applicant must elect between damages and account of profits before the close of evidence in non-split trial – whether applicant has the burden of establishing the infringer's gross sales – whether respondent in non-split trial has burden of establishing costs incurred in relation to, including portion of general overhead reasonably attributable to, infringing goods – whether profits may be calculated using a measure of guesswork and estimation Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Acme Office Service Pty Ltd v Lundstrom [2002] NSWSC 277 Adidas-Solomon AG v Turner (2003) 58 IPR 66 Allan v Development Allowance Authority (1999) FCR 264 Assa Abloy Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Lock Co Pty Ltd (2005) 147 FCR 126 Australian Woollen Mills Ltd v F S Walton & Co Ltd (1937) 58 CLR 641 Bond Brewing Holdings Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd (1990) 1 ACSR 445 Booker Industries Pty Ltd v Wilson Parking (Qld) Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 600 Brother Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supplies Pty Ltd (2007) 163 FCR 530 Coca-Cola Co v All-Fect Distributors Ltd (1999) 96 FCR 107 Colorado Group Ltd v Strandbags Group Pty Ltd (2007) 164 FCR 506 Dart Industries Inc v Décor Corporation Pty Ltd (1993) 179 CLR 101 Dr Martens Australia Pty Ltd v Bata Shoe Company of Australia Pty Ltd (1997) 75 FCR 230 E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 934 Enzed Holdings Ltd v Wynthea Pty Ltd (1984) 57 ALR 167 Figgins Holdings Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks (1995) 59 FCR 147 Frank Music Corp v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc (9th Cir 1985) 772 F2d 505 GM & AM Pearce & Co Pty Ltd v Australian Tallow Producers [2005] VSCA 113 Hall v Poolman (2007) 215 FLR 243 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Koninklijke Phillips Electronics NV v Remington Products Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 100 FCR 90 Lamb v Cotogno (1987) 164 CLR 1 Microsoft Corporation v TYN Electronics Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (2004) 63 IPR 137 Paramount Pictures Corporation v Hasluck (2006) 70 IPR 293 Pegela Pty Ltd v National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Ltd [2006] VSC 507 Placer (Granny Smith) Pty Ltd v Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd (2003) 196 ALR 257 Polo Textile Industries Pty Ltd v Domestic Textile Corporation Pty Ltd (1993) 42 FCR 227 Sony Computer Entertainment Australia Pty Ltd v Stirling [2001] FCA 1852 Sudojo Consulting Pty Ltd v Africa Pacific Capital Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 353 Winterton Constructions Pty Ltd v Hambros Australia Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 97 XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd (1984) 155 CLR 448
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate