Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd v Kooee Communications Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1027
Practice and Procedure – motion to stay or dismiss application – Anshun estoppel – whether unreasonable not to have pursued present claim in previous proceeding in the New South Wales Supreme Court – whether present application arises out of substantially the same facts as previous proceeding – whether risk of inconsistent judgments – whether special circumstances justifying decision not to raise claim in previous proceeding Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52
Bazos v Doman [2001] NSWCA 347, followed Custombuilt Homes Pty Ltd v Dowell [2005] WASCA 221, followed Egglishaw v Australian Crime Commission (2007) 164 CLR 224, applied Gibbs v Kinna (1999) 2 VR 19, followed Henjo Investments Pty Ltd v Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd (No 1) (New York Deli case)(1988) 39 FCR 546, referred to Ling v Commonwealth of Australia (1996) 68 FCR 180, applied Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589, applied Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd v Kooee Communications Limited [2007] NSWSC 91, referred to R & J Lyons Family Settlement Pty Ltd v 155 Macquarie Street Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 232, referred to Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378, distinguished Wong v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 146 FCR 1, followed PRIMUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS PTY LTD (ACN 071 191 396) v KOOEE COMMUNICATIONS PTY LTD (ACN 001 341 331)
VID 1227 OF 2007
MARSHALL J
10 JULY 2008
MELBOURNE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 1227 OF 2007
BETWEEN: PRIMUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS PTY LTD
(ACN 071 191 396)
Applicant
AND: KOOEE COMMUNICATIONS PTY LTD (ACN 001 341 331)
Respondent
JUDGE: MARSHALL J DATE OF ORDER: 10 JULY 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate