Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Priestley v Godwin [2008] FCA 1179 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applications for recusal and adjournment – applications refused
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) s 21(1) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) ss 40, 79 Federal Court Rules O 20 r 5 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 cited Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 applied General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 cited Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 cited Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70 cited Priestley v Godwin [2008] FCA 835 cited Rossetto v Meriton Apartments Proprietary Limited [2006] FCA 1290 cited Webb v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 41 considered MICHAEL PRIESTLEY v ANNWYN GODWIN PARLIAMENTARY SERVICE MERIT PROTECTION COMMISSIONER
ACD 1 of 2008 MICHAEL PRIESTLEY v THE HONOURABLE DAVID PETER MAXWELL HAWKER SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATOR THE HONOURABLE ALAN BAIRD FERGUSON PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE
ACD 2 of 2008
BENNETT J
16 JULY 2008
CANBERRA IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY ACD 1 of 2008
DISTRICT REGISTRY
BETWEEN: MICHAEL PRIESTLEY
Applicant
AND: ANNWYN GODWIN
PARLIAMENTARY SERVICE MERIT PROTECTION COMMISSIONER
Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY ACD 2 of 2008
DISTRICT REGISTRY
BETWEEN: MICHAEL PRIESTLEY
Applicant
AND: THE HONOURABLE DAVID PETER MAXWELL HAWKER SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
First Respondent
SENATOR THE HONOURABLE ALAN BAIRD FERGUSON
PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BENNETT J DATE OF ORDER: 16 JULY 2008
WHERE MADE: CANBERRA
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate