Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
P v Australian Crime Commission [2008] FCA 1336
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – confidentiality orders – s 50 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) - whether confidentiality orders should continue in respect of evidence which was adduced and tendered in the expectation that confidentiality orders would continue to apply in respect of the evidence – principle of open justice – whether embarrassment caused by the disclosure of confidential personal, financial and taxation information warrants the making of confidentiality orders – onus of proof where confidentiality orders have been made and the Court is asked to rescind those orders Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth), ss 7C, 27, 28, 29, 29A, 29B Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 17, 50 Federal Court Rules(Cth), O 4 r 4, O 46 r 6 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish (1980) 29 ALR 228 C v Australian Crime Commission [2005] FCA 1736 Herald & Weekly Times v Williams (2003) 130 FCR 435 P v AUSTRALIAN CRIME COMMISSION AND ANOR
NSD 373 OF 2006
EMMETT J
29 AUGUST 2008
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD373 OF 2006
BETWEEN: P
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN CRIME COMMISSION
First Respondent
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE AUSTRALIAN CRIME COMMISSION
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 29 AUGUST 2008
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. All current orders made under s 50 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) be vacated. 2. Order 1 be stayed up until 12 September 2008. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD373 OF 2006
BETWEEN: P
Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate