Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Harbour City Real Estate Pty Ltd t/as Re/Max Harbour City Real Estate (ACN 111 210 023) v Cargill [2008] FCA 1382
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for stay pending appeal – discretion to grant a stay – competing rights of the parties – respondent on Centrelink benefits - some risk of at least delay in liquidating assets if appeal successful
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 29 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 718, 722, 728, 824(2) Federal Court Rules O 52 r 17(1) Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v BMW (Australia) Ltd (No 2) [2003] FCA 864 Australian Solar Mesh Sales Pty Ltd v Anderson [1999] FCA 964 Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) v Myer Emporium Ltd (No 1) (1986) 160 CLR 220 Henderson v Amadio Pty Ltd (No 3) (1996) 65 FCR 66 McBride v Sandland (No 2) (1918) 25 CLR 369 Powerflex Services Pty Ltd v Data Access Corporation (1996) 67 FCR 65 Prestige Property Services Pty Ltd v Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union [2006] FCA 180 Re Middle Harbour Investments Ltd (in liq) (unreported, Court of Appeal, NSW, 15 December 1976) Welcome Real-time SA v Catuity Inc (No 2) [2002] FCA 258 HARBOUR CITY REAL ESTATE PTY LTD T/AS RE/MAX HARBOUR CITY REAL ESTATE (ACN 111 210 023) and CECILY ROBERTSON v JANE CHRISTINE CARGILL
WAD 125 OF 2008
MCKERRACHER J
9 SEPTEMBER 2008
PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD 125 OF 2008
ON APPEAL FROM THE INDUSTRIAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA BETWEEN: HARBOUR CITY REAL ESTATE PTY LTD T/AS RE/MAX HARBOUR CITY REAL ESTATE (ACN 111 210 023)
First Appellant
CECILY ROBERTSON
Second Appellant
AND: JANE CHRISTINE CARGILL
Respondent
JUDGE: MCKERRACHER J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate