Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZKCU v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1388 MIGRATION – visa – protection visa – no ground for quashing decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – faulty reasoning of Tribunal member – concern that appellant has not had his claims considered properly
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 5(1), 36, 424, 424A
Convention relating to the Status of Refugees done at Geneva on 28 July 1951 Art 1(A)(2) Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees done at New York on 31 January 1967 SZKCU v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2007] FMCA 1926cited SZKCU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
NSD 2344 of 2007
GRAY J
12 SEPTEMBER 2008
MELBOURNE (VIDEO LINK TO SYDNEY) IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2344 of 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZKCU
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: GRAY J DATE OF ORDER: 12 SEPTEMBER 2008
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE (video link to SYDNEY)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The order of the Court made this day be recalled and paragraph 3 of that order be revoked. 2. The order of the Court be that: 1. The Refugee Review Tribunal be added as the second respondent to the proceeding, and the title of the proceeding be amended accordingly. 2. The appeal be dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2344 of 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZKCU
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate