Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
HK/NABR v GSL (Australia) Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1390
HK/NABR v GSL (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD, CENTRE EXECUTIVE OF DIAC FOR VILLAWOOD IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTRE, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
NSD 676 of 2008
GRAHAM J
21 AUGUST 2008
MELBOURNE BY VIDEO LINK TO SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 676 of 2008
BETWEEN: HK/NABR
Applicant
AND: GSL (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
First Respondent
CENTRE EXECUTIVE OF DIAC FOR VILLAWOOD IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTRE
Second Respondent
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
Third Respondent
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Fourth Respondent
JUDGE: GRAHAM J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 AUGUST 2008
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE BY VIDEO LINK TO SYDNEY
THE COURT:
1. Notes that the third and fourth respondents undertake to secure the return to the applicant of the notebook computer claimed by the applicant to have been confiscated and referred to in the Application, upon the removal of the applicant from the Villawood Detention Centre in Sydney on Friday, 22 August 2008. 2. Orders that the Notice of Motion filed 21 August 2008 be dismissed. 3. Orders that the applicant pay the third and fourth respondents' costs. 4. Orders that in the published reasons for judgment on the applicant's Notice of Motion filed 21 August 2008 the applicant shall be described by the pseudonym 'HK/NABR'. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 676 of 2008
BETWEEN: HK/NABR
Applicant
AND: GSL (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
First Respondent
CENTRE EXECUTIVE OF DIAC FOR VILLAWOOD IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTRE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate