Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Glueck v Stang (No 2) [2008] FCA 1439
BRUNO ANTHONY GLUECK v MAURICE STANG, STEVEN KRITZLER, NOVAPHARM RESEARCH (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED (ACN 003 086 637), HYO SANG KWON, CAROL DITTERICK AND AERIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD (ACN 093 977 336)
NSD 1021 of 2007
LINDGREN J
3 SEPTEMBER 2008
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1021 of 2007
BETWEEN: BRUNO ANTHONY GLUECK
Applicant
AND: MAURICE STANG
First Respondent
STEVEN KRITZLER
Second Respondent
NOVAPHARM RESEARCH (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED (ACN 003 086 637)
Third Respondent
HYO SANG KWON
Fourth Respondent
CAROL DITTERICK
Fifth Respondent
AERIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD
(ACN 093 977 336)
Sixth Respondent
JUDGE: LINDGREN J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 SEPTEMBER 2008
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant pay the costs of the former first respondent (Maurice Stang), second respondent (Steven Kritzler) and fifth respondent (Carol Ditterick) in the proceeding to the extent that those costs are not already the subject of costs orders. 2. To the extent not already covered by order 2 of the orders made on 23 July 2008, the applicant pay the third respondent's costs thrown away by reason of the applicant's amendments, and proposed amendments, to his pleadings during the period 30 May 2008 to 23 July 2008 (inclusive of those dates). 3. The costs referred to in order 1 above be quantified as a gross sum pursuant to O 62 r 4(2) in the amount of $57,857.88. 4. The costs referred to in order 2 above and the costs the subject of order 2 of the orders made on 23 July 2008 be quantified as a gross sum pursuant to O 62 r 4(2) in the amount of $14,847.76. 5. The applicant pay the amount of $57,857.88 referred to in order 3 by 24 September 2008 pursuant to O 62 r 3(2). 6. The third respondent have liberty to apply at any time on three days' notice for an order than the applicant pay the amount of $14,847.76 referred to in order 4 pursuant to O 62 r 3(2). Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate