Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cosgrove v Donnelly [2008] FCA 1538
JOHN COSGROVE and OTHERS v CHARLES DONNELLY and OTHERS
NSD 1586 of 2006
COWDROY J
15 OCTOBER 2008
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1586 of 2006
BETWEEN: JOHN COSGROVE
First Applicant
NICK THREDGOLD
Second Applicant
MARTIN PRITCHARD
Third Applicant
JOSEPH BULLOCK
Fourth Applicant
DERRICK BELAN
Fifth Applicant
LESLIE JOHN SEAMAN
Sixth Applicant
RUSSELL VIERITZ
Seventh Applicant
AND: CHARLES DONNELLY
First Respondent
TIMOTHY KENNEDY
Second Respondent
DOUG STEVENS
Third Respondent
ANTONY THOW
Fourth Respondent
ANTONIA PARKES
Fifth Respondent
GAYLE BURMEISTER
Sixth Respondent
MARISA BERNARDI
Seventh Respondent
RON HERBERT
Eighth Respondent
BILL BOLITHO
Ninth Respondent
CAMERON STOPS
Tenth Respondent
DAVE HOCKING
Eleventh Respondent
RIF ALTAY
Twelfth Respondent
STEVE HOWIE
Thirteenth Respondent
ESMOND CURNOW
Fourteenth Respondent
GREG LEE
Fifteenth Respondent
CHRIS KALOMIRIS
Sixteenth Respondent
GARY MAAS
Seventeenth Respondent
BELINDA JACOBI
Eighteenth Respondent
ROD WIGG
Nineteenth Respondent
CHRISTOPHER CALVERT
Twentieth Respondent
JOHN GLOVER
Twenty-First Respondent
PETER THOMSON
Twenty-second Respondent
ANDREW RILEY
Twenty-third Respondent
JULIE WARREN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate