Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZLZY v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1655
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 235 ALR 609 VAF v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 206 ALR 471 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507 SCAA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 668 NAAP v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 805 SBBF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 358 SZLZY v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
NSD 1297 of 2008
REEVES J
7 NOVEMBER 2008
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1297 of 2008
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZLZY
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: REEVES J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 NOVEMBER 2008
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court's website. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1297 of 2008
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZLZY
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: REEVES J
DATE: 7 NOVEMBER 2008
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
INTRODUCTION 1 This is an appeal against the judgment of Federal Magistrate Raphael delivered on 30 July 2008which dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ('the Tribunal'). The Tribunal's decision was handed down on 24 January 2008 and affirmed a decision of a delegate of the first respondent to refuse the appellant a protection visa. The appellant contends that the Federal Magistrate erred in determining that the Tribunal's conclusions on certain matters were not 'information' for the purposes of s424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ('the Act'). The appellant also seeks to raise, for the first time, what appears to be an allegation of bias against the Tribunal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate