Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
C Incorporated v Australian Crime Commission [2008] FCA 1806
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Australian Crime Commission Examiner issuing notice requiring production of medical records of Aboriginal children - requirement of Teoh that the best interests of the children be a primary consideration - whether proper consideration given by the Examiner to the best interests of the children concerned in issuing the notice - whether legitimate expectation affords substantive or procedural rights - failure to afford procedural fairness and natural justice - s 29 of Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) - s 5 of Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977(Cth) Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs and Other Legislation Amendment (Northern Territory Emergency Response and Other Measures) Act 2007 Australian Crime Commission Amendment Act 2007 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) National Crime Authority Act 1984 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) NTD8 v Australian Crime Commission (No 2) [2008] FCA 1551 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 Duff v Freijah (1982) 43 ALR 479 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Re; Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1 Royal Women's Hospital v Medical Practitioners Board (2006) VSCA 85 Sanders v Snell (1998) 196 CLR 329 Untan v Minister forImmigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 69 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 Sebastian v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 31 Vaitaiki v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1998) 150 ALR 608 Public Service Board v Osmond (1986) 159 CLR 656 Haoucher v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1990) 169 CLR 648 Saitta Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation and Anor [2002] FCA 1105 Customs v Kawasaki Motors (No 1) (1991) 32 FCR 219 Queensland Medical Laboratory v Blewett (1988) 84 ALR 615 Botany Bay City Council v Minister of State for Transport and Regional Development (1996) 66 FCR 537 May v Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 92 FCR 152 MM & Anor v ACC [2007] FCA 2026 Structureco Inc v Registrar of Trademarks [2003] 132 FCR 558 Woodroffe v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 179 ALR 750 Johns v ASC (1993) 178 CLR 408 Riverside Nursing Care Pty ltd v Bishop (2000) 100 FCR 519 Perez v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 450 Wan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2000] FCA 1822 Barnes v Boulton (2004) 139 FCR 356 Duxbury A, The Impact and Significance of Teoh and Lam in Groves and Lee, Australian Administrative Law, Cambridge University Press 2007 Carolyn Doyle and Mirko Bagaric Privacy Law in Australia The Federation Press 2005 C INCORPORATED v AUSTRALIAN CRIME COMMISSION and JEFFREY PHILIP ANDERSON
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate