Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ferdinands v Chief of Army [2008] FCA 1865
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time within which to apply to show cause – application remitted from the High Court – application for writs of certiorari and mandamus – application significantly out of time – factors relevant to grant of an extension of time – impecuniosity itself is not a sufficient reason to grant an extension of time – no prospect of the applicant succeeding – application dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applicant sought to use application to challenge convictions by the Adelaide Magistrates Court and a Defence Force Magistrate – application was an abuse of process – application dismissed Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) Ferdinands v The Chief of Army [2003] FCAFC 10 referred to Gallo v Dawson (1990) 93 ALR 479 cited Re Commonwealth; Ex parte Marks (2000) 177 ALR 491 cited TREVOR KINGSLEY FERDINANDS v CHIEF OF ARMY and DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE
SAD 141 of 2007
LANDER J
3 DECEMBER 2008
ADELAIDE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 141 of 2007
BETWEEN: TREVOR KINGSLEY FERDINANDS
Applicant
AND: CHIEF OF ARMY
First Respondent
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE
Second Respondent
JUDGE: LANDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 DECEMBER 2008
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an extension of time to file the proceeding to show cause be dismissed. 2. The proceeding be dismissed. 3. The applicant pay the respondents' costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 141 of 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate