Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
L v Commonwealth of Australia [2009] FCA 4
L v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, THE NATIONAL CONVENOR, THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS TRIBUNAL, THE SECRETARY, THE DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS, THE GENERAL MANAGER, CRS AUSTRALIA, THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES, ANNETTE O'NEILL, STEPHEN HODGES, JULIAN MILLAR and AMANDA MACDONALD
NSD 843 of 2008
STONE J
9 JANUARY 2009
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 843 of 2008
BETWEEN: L
Applicant
AND: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
First Respondent
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Second Respondent
THE NATIONAL CONVENOR, THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS TRIBUNAL
Third Respondent
THE SECRETARY, THE DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
Fourth Respondent
THE GENERAL MANAGER, CRS AUSTRALIA
Fifth Respondent
THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Sixth Respondent
ANNETTE O'NEILL
Seventh Respondent
STEPHEN HODGES
Eighth Respondent
JULIAN MILLAR
Ninth Respondent
AMANDA MACDONALD
Tenth Respondent
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 9 JANUARY 2009
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Leave to appeal be refused. 2. The application be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court's website. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 843 of 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate