Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ranallo v The Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2009] FCA 113
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for review of decision of Australian Community Pharmacy Authority – Authority recommended that the applicant not be approved to supply pharmaceutical benefits from proposed premises – approval denied because premises did not have the 'equivalent of at least 8 full-time prescribing medical practitioners' practising at the Centre – error of law alleged – interpretation of terms 'equivalent' and 'full-time' – terms held to be directed at hours worked not output Held: the application be dismissed. Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15AA Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5(1)(f) National Health Act 1953 (Cth) ss 90, 99K, 99L Acts Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) s 33 National Health (Australian Community Pharmacy Authority Rules) Determination 2006 ss 6, 9, 10 Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (1920) 28 CLR 129 Amber-Jane Ranallo v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2008] AATA 533 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club (1997) 187 CLR 384 Cody v J H Nelson Pty Ltd (1947) 74 CLR 629 Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297 Forsythe v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2007) 231 CLR 531 Harradine v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1989) 25 FCR 35 Lane and Others v Arrowcrest Group Pty Limited (t/a ROH Alloy Wheels) (1990) 27 FCR 427 Marshall v Director-General, Department of Transport (2001) 205 CLR 603 Miller v The Commonwealth (1904) 1 CLR 668 Mills v Meeking (1990) 169 CLR 214 Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act v NSW Aboriginal Land Council (2008) 249 ALR 602 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Re Higham (1986) 5 ACLC 352 Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1 Thompson and James v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [1996] AATA 367 Thompson v Judge Byrne (1999) 196 CLR 141 Wacal Developments Pty Ltd v Realty Developments Pty Ltd (1978) 140 CLR 503 AMBER-JANE RANALLO v THE AUSTRALIAN COMMUNITY PHARMACY AUTHORITY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate