Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nicholls v Australian Federal Police (No 3) [2009] FCA 152
ARTHUR CHRISTOPHER NICHOLLS v AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE and DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
SAD 138 of 2008
MANSFIELD J
23 FEBRUARY 2009
ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 138 of 2008
BETWEEN: ARTHUR CHRISTOPHER NICHOLLS
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE
First Respondent
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER: 23 FEBRUARY 2009
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS
On Applicant's Notice of Motion of 23 February 2009: 1. Leave to Applicant to amend paragraph 2 of the Notice of Motion of 23 February 2009 by adding at its commencement "Leave to appeal from" in lieu of the word "That" and by adding at its end the words "insofar as such orders refused to make an order under s 50 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) in relation to the contents of the affidavits referred to in paragraph 9 of the reasons for ruling published on 19 February 2009" in lieu of the words "be set aside". 2. Application for leave to appeal from the reasons for ruling of 19 February 2009 whereby the applicant's request for certain documents to be ordered to be confidential was rejected refused. 3. Application for stay of operation of the said ruling and orders refused. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 138 of 2008
BETWEEN: ARTHUR CHRISTOPHER NICHOLLS
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE
First Respondent
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate