Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Emirates v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2009] FCA 312
TRADE PRACTICES – Investigative function – Validity of s 155 Notices – 'Matter' under investigation – Relevance of information sought – Burdensome – Unreasonableness of decision to issue s 155 Notice – Market definition – Market in Australia
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 5(2)(g), s 16 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 17, s 50 Sherman Act 15 USC § 1 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 4D, s 4E, s 45, s 45(2), s 45(3), s 45A, s 45A(1), s 45A(8), s 155, s 155(1), s 155(5), s 155(6A), s 163A
A. B. Pty Limited v Australian Crime Commission [2009] FCA 119 cited Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 cited Auskay International Marketing & Trade Pty Ltd v Qantas Airways Ltd [2008] FCA 1458 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Qantas Airways Limited [2008] FCA 1976 cited Australian Conservation Foundation v Forestry Commission (1988) 19 FCR 127 cited Australian Retailers Association v Reserve Bank of Australia (2005) 148 FCR 446 cited Azriel v NSW Land & Housing Corporation [2006] NSWCA 372 cited Bannerman v Mildura Fruit Juices Pty Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 581 cited Bray v F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (2002) 118 FCR 1 cited Bray v F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (2003) 130 FCR 317 cited Bruce v Cole (1998) 45 NSWLR 163 cited Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu v Australian Securities Commission (1996) 136 ALR 453 cited Eastern Express Pty Ltd v General Newspapers Pty Ltd (1991) 30 FCR 385 cited F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd v Empagran S.A. 542 US 155 (2004) cited Hartford Fire Insurance Co v California 509 US 764 (1993) cited Korean Air Lines v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (No 3) [2008] FCA 701 cited Melbourne Home of Ford Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (No 3) (1980) 47 FLR 163 cited Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Moorehead (1912) 15 CLR 333 cited Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 cited NT Power Generation Pty Ltd v Power and Water Authority (2004) 219 CLR 90 cited Pioneer Concrete (Vic) Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1982) 152 CLR 460 cited Pyneboard Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1982) 57 FLR 368 followed Queensland Wire Industries Pty Ltd v Broken Hill Proprietary Company Ltd (1989) 167 CLR 177 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S 20/2002 (2003) 198 ALR 59 cited Re Tooth & Co Ltd (1978) 31 FLR 314 followed Riverstone Computer Services Pty Ltd v IBM Global Financing Australia Limited [2002] FCA 1608 approved Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53 cited S A Brewing Holdings Ltd v Baxt (1989) 23 FCR 357 cited SCAS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 397 cited Seven Network Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2004) 140 FCR 170 followed Singapore Airlines Ltd v Taprobane Tours WA Pty Ltd (1991) 33 FCR 158 cited South Sydney District Rugby League Football Club v News Limited (2000) 177 ALR 611 cited Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323 cited Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 2) (1979) 40 FLR 83 cited Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 131 FCR 529 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate