Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SZJRU v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 315 MIGRATION – application for protection visa – claim that appellant has well-founded fear of being persecuted for membership of particular social group – where appellant claimed to be parent of child born in contravention of China's one child policy – where appellant claimed to have been issued with forced sterilisation notice – delegate of first respondent refused application – Tribunal affirmed decision of delegate – whether Tribunal erred in approaching matter by not first identifying particular social group – whether Tribunal erred in finding forced sterilisation non-discriminatory penalty for contravention of law of general application – whether any error in finding as to forced sterilisation constitutes jurisdictional error Held: appeal allowed – no error in not identifying particular social group but jurisdictional error made in finding as to forced sterilisation.
Constitution s 75(v) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 65, 91R, 91S, 424A, 474 Federal Court Rules O 43 r 2 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees Art 1A Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225 discussed Applicant S v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2004) 217 CLR 387 discussed Chen Shi Hai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 201 CLR 293 discussed Craig v The State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 cited Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 77 ALJR 1088; 197 ALR 389 discussed Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 194 ALR 244 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Israelian (2001) 206 CLR 323 cited Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal (2002) 76 ALJR 966; 190 ALR 601 cited NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 cited Plaintiff S157/2002 v The Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 (2003) 77 ALJR 1165; 198 ALR 59 referred to SFGB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 77 ALD 402 followed Sinclair v Mining Warden at Maryborough (1975) 132 CLR 473 cited SZDFZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2008) 168 FCR 1 referred to SZDTZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1824 referred to SZKMX v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 856 referred to VTAO v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 81 ALD 332 discussed SZJRU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate