Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fegan v Kathy Jackson [2009] FCA 338
INDUSTRIAL LAW – organisations – Union rules amended by Branch Committee pursuant to rules of the Union – whether interim orders should be granted requiring National Secretary of the Union to apply forthwith to the Industrial Registrar for certification of rule changes – role of the Industrial Registrar before certification of changes to the rules – test for interim orders – whether interim orders should be granted – application granted Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) Schedule 1, ss 159, 164, 338(1) of Schedule 1 Workplace Relations (Registration and Accountability of Organisations) Regulations 2003 (Cth) regs 3, 12, 126 R v Joske; ex parte Shop Distributive and Allied Employees' Association (1976) 135 CLR 194 referred to McGee v Sanders (No 2) (1991) 32 FCR 397 referred to Conquo v Jackson [2009] FCA 45 referred to PAULINE FEGAN v KATHY JACKSON
VID 190 of 2009
KENNY J
9 APRIL 2009
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 190 of 2009
BETWEEN: PAULINE FEGAN
Applicant
AND: KATHY JACKSON
Respondent
JUDGE: KENNY J
DATE: 9 APRIL 2009
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 On 31 March 2009, having had the benefit of the parties' submissions, I made interim orders sought by the applicant, Pauline Fegan. I stated that I would deliver reasons at a later date. What follows are my reasons for making the orders that day. 2 Ms Fegan brings this proceeding as President of Victoria No. 1 Branch of the Health Services Union, and a member of the Union. The respondent, Ms Kathy Jackson, is the National Secretary of the Union. 3 Ms Fegan sought interim orders pursuant to s 164(4) of Schedule 1 to the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) requiring Ms Jackson to apply forthwith to the Industrial Registrar for certification of changes to the rules of the Union (in so far as they related to the internal management of Victoria No. 1 Branch). These changes were purportedly made by the Branch Committee on 24 February 2009. 4 In essence, Ms Fegan contended that, under the Union's rules, Ms Jackson, as National Secretary, was required to apply to the Industrial Registrar for certification of the rule changes. Counsel for Ms Jackson opposed the making of interim orders sought by Ms Fegan. 5 The applicant relied on her own affidavit affirmed on 26 March 2009. The respondent filed no answering affidavits.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate