Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Qi Guang Guo v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 356
MIGRATION – regulations – validity – where appellant's previous visa had been cancelled on character grounds – where appellant unable to apply for relevant visa under legislative scheme – whether Tribunal erred in taking into account particular clause of regulations because clause invalid – whether clause beyond power or inconsistent with Act – whether clause constituted unreasonable exercise of power or exercise of power lacking reasonable proportionality Held: appeal dismissed – clause not beyond power or inconsistent with Act and did not constitute unreasonable exercise of power or lack reasonable proportionality. Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 48 Melbourne Harbour Trust Act 1928 (Vic) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 31, 40, 48, 501, 504 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 2.12 Chertsey Urban District Council v Mixnam's Properties Ltd [1965] AC 735 cited Clements v Bull (1953) 88 CLR 572 discussed De Silva v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 89 FCR 502 cited House v Forestry Tasmania (1995) 5 Tas R 169 referred to Kruse v Johnson [1898] 2 QB 91 referred to Li v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 94 FCR 219 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 77 referred to Minister for Primary Industries and Energy v Austral Fisheries Pty Ltd (1993) 40 FCR 381 discussed Minister of State for Resources v Dover Fisheries Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 565 discussed Mixnam's Properties Ltd v Chertsey Urban District Council [1964] 1 QB 214 discussed Paradise Projects Pty Ltd v Gold Coast City Council [1994] 1 Qd R 314 referred to Re Gold Coast City Council By-laws [1994] 1 Qd R 130 referred to Re Gold Coast City (Touting and Distribution of Printed Matter) Law 1994 (1995) 86 LGREA 288 referred to Slattery v Naylor (1888) 13 App Cas 446 discussed The Mayor, Councillors and the Citizens of the City of Brunswick v Stewart (1941) 65 CLR 88 discussed The State of South Australia v Tanner (1989) 166 CLR 161 discussed Vanstone v Clark (2005) 147 FCR 299 cited Widgee Shire Council v Bonney (1907) 4 CLR 977 discussed Williams v The Mayor, Aldermen, Councillors and Citizens of the City of Melbourne (1933) 49 CLR 142 discussed Aronson M, Dyer B and Groves M, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (4th ed, Lawbook Co, 2009) Pearce D and Argument S, Delegated Legislation in Australia (3rd ed, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2005) QI GUANG GUO v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate