Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jones v Toben (No 2) [2009] FCA 477
CONTEMPT – penalty – respondent previously found guilty of 24 counts of contempt – no evidence adduced to explain respondent's conduct – respondent continued to breach orders and undertaking after trial of proceedings – respondent published document on morning of penalty hearing scandalising the Court – evidence showed a continuing public defiance of authority of the Court – conduct designed to undermine authority of the Court – applicant entitled to expect the orders obtained to be obeyed by the respondent – respondent's public defiance of Court's orders gives rise to penal or disciplinary jurisdiction of the Court – respondent impecunious – seriousness of respondent's conduct meant financial circumstances not relevant to question of penalty – impecuniosity not a reason to imprison a person when the appropriate penalty would otherwise be a fine – sentence of imprisonment required because of seriousness of conduct – inappropriate to suspend sentence – respondent to be imprisoned for three months COSTS – application for indemnity costs – sum claimed by applicant too high for what was involved in proceeding – respondent impecunious and unable to pay – applicant's costs to be paid by respondent on a party and party basis Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) High Court Rules 2004 r 11.04.1(a) AMIEU v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98 cited Coonan & Denlay Pty Ltd v Superstar Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) (1981) 57 FLR 118 cited Whitham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525 cited JEREMY JONES v FREDRICK TOBEN
NSD 327 of 2001
LANDER J
13 MAY 2009
ADELAIDE (VIDEOLINK TO SYDNEY AND MELBOURNE) IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 327 of 2001
BETWEEN: JEREMY JONES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate