Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd [2009] FCA 510
TRADE PRACTICES – application to strike out statement of claim – whether statement of claim discloses reasonable cause of action – whether statement of claim fails to identify a market in Australian within the meaning of s 4E of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – whether statement of claim fails to plead material facts and alleges contraventions with such generality that they cannot amount to contraventions of the Trade Practices Act – global market is capable of constituting a market in Australia – market in Australia within the meaning of the Trade Practices Act sufficiently identified in pleading – pleadings failed to establish how alleged understandings have the proscribed effect on competition in a market in Australia – failure to state material facts – statement of claim struck out. Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 4D, 5, 45, 45A Auskay International Manufacturing & Trade Pty Ltd v Qantas Airways Ltd (2009) 251 ALR 166 distinguished Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v British Airways PLC [2008] FCA 1977 distinguished Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Qantas Airways Ltd (2009) 253 ALR 89 distinguished Banque Commerciale SA en liquidation v Akhil Holdings Limited (1990) 169 CLR 279 referred to Eastern Express Pty Limited v General Newspapers Pty Limited (1991) 30 FCR 385 referred to Emirates v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2009] FCA 312 followed Kuligowski v Metrobus (2004) 220 CLR 363 applied Queensland Wire Industries Proprietary Limited v Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited (1989) 167 CLR 177 referred to Riverstone Computer Services Pty Limited v IBM Global Financing Australia Limited [2002] FCA 1608 referred to Rural Press Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53 applied Singapore Airlines Limited v Taprobane Tours WA Pty Ltd (1991) 33 FCR 158 referred to South Sydney District Rugby League Ltd v News Ltd (2000) 177 ALR 611 referred to AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v SINGAPORE AIRLINES CARGO PTE LTD (ACN 095 934 857)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate