Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Davidova v Murphy [2009] FCA 601
BANKRUPTCY – application for annulment – dismissed – appeal PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal – want of prosecution – failure by Appellant to prepare an Appeal Book – an appeal in the nature of a "rehearing" – further evidence on appeal Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 52(2), (4), (5), 153B Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 25(1A), (2B)(ba), 27 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 35 r 7(3), O 52 rr 27, 28A, 38 Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 (Cth) r 1.05
Abraham v Attorney-General for the Commonwealth [2004] FCA 411, cited Allesch v Maunz [2000] HCA 40, 203 CLR 172, applied Bankstown Grammar School Ltd v Park [2000] FCA 1205, applied Bayne v Baillieu; Bayne v Riggall (1908) 6 CLR 382, cited Boumelhem v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2008] FCA 1568, 171 FCR 462, applied Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1833, 117 FCR 424, applied Bulic v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd [2007] FCA 307, applied Brunninghausen v Glavanics [1998] FCA 230, cited Cavoli v Etl [2007] FCA 1191, cited Edelsten v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1986) 86 ALR 257, applied Elyard Corporation Pty Ltd v DDB Needham Sydney Pty Ltd (1995) 61 FCR 385, cited Evans v Hi-Fert Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 802, cited Re Frank; Ex parte Poliszky (1987) 16 FCR 396, applied Gargan v Kippin Investments Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1718, cited Goldie v The Commonwealth of Australia [2004] FCA 973, cited Griffiths v Boral Resources (Qld) Pty Ltd [2006] FCAFC 149, 154 FCR 554, cited Hacker v The Owners - Strata Plan No 17572 [2005] FCA 1936, cited Heinrich v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2003] FCAFC 315, applied Hughes v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2004] FCA 1271, cited Jandruwanda v University of South Australia [2003] FCA 1456, cited Johnston v Challen t/as Hawthorn Cappaidge and Badgery [2006] FCA 401, cited Khera v Jones [2008] FCA 548, cited Killoran v Duncan [1999] FCA 1574, cited Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 170, 242 ALR 586, cited Maas v Maas (unreported, FCA, Ryan, Heerey and Tamberlin JJ, NG 283 of 1998, 16 November 1998), cited Matthews v Collett [2000] FCA 224, applied Maxwell-Smith v S & E Hall Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 825, 233 ALR 81, cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17, 205 CLR 507, applied Murphy v Revis [2008] FMCA 1561, cited NBCI v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 280, cited Re Papps; Ex parte Tapp (1997) 78 FCR 524, cited Pollock v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1994) 94 ATC 4148, cited Purvis v Dairy Adjustment Authority (No 2) [2006] FCAFC 38, 150 FCR 48, cited Revis v Murphy [2008] FMCA 1638, affirmed Rigg v Baker [2006] FCAFC 179, 155 FCR 531, cited Roskell v Snelgrove [2008] FCA 427, applied Samootin v Wagner [2008] FCA 1066, cited Singh v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2008] FCA 544, cited Sobey v Nicol [2007] FCAFC 136, 245 ALR 389, cited Re Sterling; Ex parte Esanda Ltd (1980) 44 FLR 125, cited Totev v Sfar [2006] FCA 470, 230 ALR 236, applied Van Reesema v Giameos (1979) 41 FLR 86, cited Voskuilen v Morisset Megamarket Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 1727, cited Watts v Adelaide Bank Ltd [2009] FCA 420, applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate