O'Donoghue v Ireland [2009] FCA 618

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

O'Donoghue v Ireland [2009] FCA 618

EXTRADITION – review of magistrate's decision pursuant to section 21(2) of Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) – supporting documents constitute a duly authenticated statement in writing setting out the conduct constituting the offence - alleged conduct constituted an extradition offence in Western Australia. Extradition Act 1988 (Cth): s 3(a), s 10(2) s 12(1), s 19, s 19(2), s 19(2)(a), s 19(2)(c), s 19(3)(c)(i), s 19(3)(c)(ii), s 19(9), s 19(10), s 21(1), s 21(2), s21(6)(g), s 22(5) Extradition Regulations (Cth): reg 3, Criminal Code (WA): s 7, s 7(d), s 371, s 371(1), s 376, s 378, s 409, s 409(1), s 409(3) Criminal Code (Qld): s 427(1) Larceny Act 1916 (Ireland): s 20(1)(iv)(a), s 32(1) Larceny Act 1990 (Ireland) s 9 Ministers and Secretaries Act 1924 (Ireland) Extradition (Ireland) Regulations (Ireland) reg 5 Cabal v United Mexican States (No 3) (2000) 186 ALR 188 DeBruyn v Republic of South Africa (1999) 96 FCR 290 Griffiths v United States of America (2005) 143 FCR 182 Harris v Attorney General of the Commonwealth (1994) 52 FCR 386 Kainhofer v Director of Public Prosecutions (No 2) (1996) 70 FCR 184 McDade v The United Kingdom [1999] FCA 1868 Parker v The Queen (1997) 186 CLR 494 Timar v Republic of Hungary [1999] FCA 1518 Truong v The Queen [2004] HCA 10; 223 CLR 122 Vasiljkovic v Commonwealth [2006] HCA 40; 227 CLR 614 Wiest v Director of Public Prosecutions (1988) 23 FCR 472 Zoeller v Federal Republic of Germany (1989) 23 FCR 282 VINCENT THOMAS O'DONOGHUE v IRELAND and GRAEME NEIL CALDER

WAD 46 of 2009

BARKER J

9 JUNE 2009

PERTH

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD 46 of 2009

BETWEEN: VINCENT THOMAS O'DONOGHUE

Applicant

AND: IRELAND

First Respondent

GRAEME NEIL CALDER