Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Weimann v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 673
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether current proceedings should be converted to a representative proceeding – preconditions to s 33C of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) made out – representative proceeding in this case would serve the administration of justice and enable a cheaper and more efficient means of resolving the dispute – leave granted to amend the application and statement of claim
Constitution, s 75, s 76, s 77 Airports (Business Concessions) Act 1959 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 177(1A)(a) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), Pt IVA, s 33C, s 33C(1), s 33C(1)(a), s 33C(1)(b), s 33C(1)(c), s 33N Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 50, s 51AC, 51AC(3)(g), s 80, s 80(1), s 82, s 87, s 87(1) s 87(2)(b) Trade Practices (Industry Codes – Franchising) Regulations 1998 (Cth), s 29(2), cl 6B, c 10
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] FCA 17 Australian Gas Light Company v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (No 2) [2003] FCA 1229 Bass v Permanent Trustee Company Limited (1999) 198 CLR 334 BMW Australia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2004) 207 ALR 452 Bray v F Hoffmann-LA Roche Ltd (2003) 130 FCR 317 Bright v Femcare Ltd (2001) 188 ALR 633 Bright v Femcare Ltd (2002) 195 ALR 574 Commonwealth v Sterling Nicholas Duty Free Pty Ltd (1972) 126 CLR 297 Draper v British Optical Association [1938] 1 All ER 115 Dormer v Solo Investments Pty Ltd (1974) 1 NSWLR 428 Foster v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2006) 149 FCR 135 Hoy Mobile Pty Ltd v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCA 810 Hoy Mobile Pty Ltd v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd (No 3) [2008] FCA 967 ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 IMF (Australia) Ltd v Sons of Gwalia Ltd (administrator appointed) (2005) 143 FCR 274 King v GIO Australia Holdings (2000) FCR 209 Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Limited (1998) 196 CLR 494 Melstrom v Garner [1970] 2 All ER 9 Pacific Brands Household Products Pty Ltd v Singan Investments Pty Ltd [2003] VSC 76 Re Clay, Clay v Booth [1919] 1 Ch 66 Tobacco Control Coalition v Philip Morris (Australia) Ltd [2000] FCA 1004 Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Ltd (2000) 200 CLR 591 Wong v Silkfield Pty Ltd (1999) 199 CLR 255
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate