Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kulik v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2009] FCA 716
VITALY KULIK v ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL and CENTRELINK
ACD 40 of 2008
RARES J
29 JUNE 2009
SYDNEY (VIA VIDEOLINK TO CANBERRA) IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY ACD 40 of 2008
BETWEEN: VITALY KULIK
Applicant
AND: ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
First Respondent
CENTRELINK
Second Respondent
JUDGE: RARES J
DATE OF ORDER: 29 JUNE 2009
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (VIA VIDEOLINK TO CANBERRA)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicants file and serve on or before 13 July 2009 an affidavit that annexes a copy of each decision by the second respondent that he contends was the subject of his three applications to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal referred in paragraph 1 of his notice of appeal filed in the court on 5 November 2008 being described as AAT ref 2007/2359, 2007/3676 and 2008/4063. 2. The applicant file and serve on or before 15 July 2009 an affidavit of service deposing to his service on the solicitor for the second respondent of the affidavit required by Order 1. 3. In default of compliance with Order 1: (a) the application will stand dismissed; (b) the applicant pay the second respondent's costs; 4. If Order 1 is complied with the proceedings stand over for directions on 3 August 2009 at 9.15 am. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court's website. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY ACD 40 of 2008
BETWEEN: VITALY KULIK
Applicant
AND: ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
First Respondent
CENTRELINK
Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate