Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Austcorp International Limited v Owers [2009] FCA 774
APPEAL – application for leave to appeal from a decision of a single judge which determined three out of 48 cases propounded in the one proceeding by means of a single Application and a single Statement of Claim – in substance, orders made below were final – leave to appeal not necessary but granted in any event – time within which to appeal as of right extended PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – observations as to the desirability of dealing with 48 separate cases in one proceeding without utilising Pt IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) or O 6 r 2 of the Federal Court Rules – three "test cases" decided – appeal from orders made in those cases – whether parties to the extant remaining cases should be made parties to the appeal from the orders made in respect of the three "test cases" – application for the joinder of the remaining parties refused Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24, s 25 and Pt IVA Federal Court Rules, O 6 r 2,O 29 r 2, O 52 rr 10 and 15
Ackers v Austcorp International Ltd [2009] FCA 432 related Baxter Healthcare Pty Limited v Comptroller-General of Customs (1997) 72 FCR 467 followed Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Limited (2004) 218 CLR 592 cited Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (No 1) (1981) 147 CLR 246 followed Radstock Co-Operative & Industrial Society v Norton-Radstock Urban District Council [1968] Ch 605, [1968] 2 All ER 59, [1968] 2 WLR 1214 cited Sanofi v Parke Davis Pty Ltd (No 1) (1982) 149 CLR 147 followed Secretary, Department of Social Security v Lowe (1999) 92 FCR 26 followed AUSTCORP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (ACN 003 132 090) v BRIAN STEPHEN OWERS and SEAR TAN-BOUNKEUA
NSD 506 of 2009
FOSTER J
22 JULY 2009
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate