Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Diakyne Pty Limited v Ralph (No 2) [2009] FCA 780
COSTS – whether indemnity costs order warranted – whether respondents' conduct in rejecting offers of settlement by the applicant amounted to conduct unreasonable or imprudent COSTS – whether proceeding should have been more suitably brought in another court – whether Order 62 rule 36A(2) of the Federal Court Rules operates to reduce costs payable Held: ordinary order as to costs made Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules
DIAKYNE PTY LIMITED (ACN 099 168 402) v PAUL RONALD RALPH and COLORADO INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED (ACN 063 688 611)
NSD 465 of 2008
JAGOT J
21 JULY 2009
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
General Division NSD 465 of 2008
BETWEEN: DIAKYNE PTY LIMITED
(ACN 099 168 402)
Applicant
AND: PAUL RONALD RALPH
First Respondent
COLORADO INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 063 688 611)
Second Respondent
JUDGE: JAGOT J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 JULY 2009
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. There be judgment for the Applicant as against the First and Second Respondents in the amount of $110,000.00 plus interest as from 30 November 2007 until the date of Judgment (an amount of $17,211.50) being a total of $127,211.50. 2. The Cross-Claim be dismissed. 3. The Respondents/Cross-Claimants pay the Applicant/Cross-Respondent's costs of the proceedings as agreed or taxed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
General Division NSD 465 of 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate